email me!  e-News Never Miss a Post! 
Jacqueline Church
Just Call Me Moses... PDF Print E-mail
Tuesday, 11 November 2008 00:00
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Wandering in the desert

Technorati released their “State of the Blogoshpere 2008? report and the discussion about its conclusions has begun.

Here are my comments on the initial conclusion drawn from, or highlighted by, Galley Cat:

“Only Two Percent of Bloggers Can Make a Living”

I have a healthy disbelief of many of the assertions of revenue at the top end of the reported scale. I also note two significant points:

1. Two bloggers cited as making over $1,000 per month had books already or launched their blogs and books around the same time. In other words, the PR machine was primed.

2. At the other end, “Among active bloggers that we surveyed, the average income was $75,000 for those who had 100,000 or more unique visitors per month (some of whom had more than one million visitors each month). The median annual income for this group is significantly lower — $22,000.” (emphasis supplied.)

I scanned the report and will probably write more about it as I analyze it, but for those of you who haven’t found your way to Galley Cat or Media Bistro yet, here’s my comment:

I think ad revenue potential is vastly over estimated by, surprise, those whose business is vested in selling traffic. Been blogging for two years and have seen lots of changes, most for the better. One thing remains constant, the refrain that “content is king” uttered by someone who is making profits selling their traffic with your content; usually uttered at the same time they say “we can’t pay you but just think of the great exposure.” The ones making money seem to be doing so by exploiting those willing to give their work away.

On the other hand, many small businesses are not prepared to take advantage of the opportunities focused sponsorship would offer them. For example, I find a product I might give up precious real estate on my blog for. I reach out. They love the idea, but they don’t know the first thing about widgets or code or how to do what they know in concept they ought to be doing. “I’m a small business and don’t really know how to do this kind of thing.”

Larger businesses who get it, don’t want to allow bloggers any control over what goes on their blogs. (Asian dating services? Oprah’s latest diet? Puh-lease.)

I refuse to host soulja-dancing re-fi ads, diet ads, or Kraft Singles ads on my blog and Adsense never rose to a full dollar of revenue after one year.

Syndication is another concept that seems to be growing but it appears that most of those doing it, still struggle to find a business model that works. They are reaching out to established savvy bloggers providing quality content, but still very uneven in the “benefits” they can offer to the bloggers providing the content they’re selling. “just think of the clicks you’ll get!”

If advertisers could figure out how to eliminate middlemen like all these - and find bloggers like me, we would all be happy. At present it seems hard to find each other in the wilderness of the blogosphere. Just call me Moses…

Povo Mojo

I thought this name, Povo, was shorthand for Post Modern Viewpoint or something. Turns out it’s Portuguese for people. As in “by the people, for the people”. This is a wiki meets yelp sort of website. All about events, happening, opinions and sharing resouces.

Tomorrow, I am speaking on a panel of bloggers hosted by the new Povo website folks. The other panelists include:

I’m honored to be asked and looking forward to a lively discussion. When the host is a guy who’s blog is entitled “Loaded Gun” you know I’m doing my homework!

One final thought:

With more magazines going belly up each day, more magazines and newspapers laying off writers every day, why is “blog” still a four-letter word? People look down their noses if you’ve “only” published electronically.

They trumpet post-election day newspaper sales as a sign that print is not dead. If they looked closer they’d see people bought newspapers with the historic headlines to keep for posterity or sell on e-bay or both. Those lined up for the next day papers did not subscribe.

Tomorrow will be good. I’ll keep you posted. Click the event page here for more info.

Trackback(0)
Comments (2)add
Magazine die-off
written by Marisa , November 21, 2008
I'm guessing you are also watching the Great Magazine Die-Off on Gawker. I agree that many niche publications can't make a go of it for a reason, but it sucks for us who need bookbuyer eyes. As it is now, there's no way to track whether a blog reader buys books (or other products). Even so, I try to spend a good part of my marketing time targeting bloggers and Amazon Top Reviewers. I just feel like it will make a difference. Ha.
Marisa
written by jacqueline , November 22, 2008
I think it's interesting as more print pubs lay off waves of writers, I will be looking for two things:
1. will the laid off writers and editors work "for exposure" as they expect bloggers to do?
2. when they get jobs for pennies a word, which is what so many in the electronic publishing world pay, will they still think that only print publications matter?

The cynic in me is thinking they will probably zoom ahead of me for jobs because there is still this myth that only print matters, while more and more find only electronic survives.

I watch with interest. Nekkid self interest, and a sociologist's curiosity both.
Write comment

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
 

Copyright © 2008 Jacqueline Church. All Rights Reserved. Valid XHTML and CSS.
Sploggers and Scrapers Stop Here! Page protected by Copyscape. DO NOT COPY.
Website design and development by hopedesigns.